Go! Team video

This Go! Team song is called "Milk Crisis," and it appears to come from an extended release of Proof of Youth, which I have yet to see. In any event, the video rocks:

Punkcraft

Nobody ever accused Jay Reatard of being smart, but in this NY Times article, he sounds like a smart musician, which he is:

“I’m not trying to be low fidelity,” he added. “I’m trying to be handmade. You don’t go into a bakery and say, ‘That apple pie is handmade, that’s a “lo-fi” pie.’ You realize the crust looks a little rough around the edges, it looks like somebody’s grandma made this, and all of a sudden it’s comforting.”

I'm still trying to make up my mind about Watch Me Fall, but I'm sure I will come around.

Jay Reatard video

Jay Reatard's got a new album out, and he's got a fun video for one of the songs up at his website. Here it is:

The birds and the bees (and the pesticides)

Bee colony collapse solved? Salon's pointing fingers at ever-responsible agribusiness. Global ecological apocalypse averted ... for now.

Stevie Wonder on the drums

Via.

Mid-Exam Humor

Why had it not occurred to me before? The right wing loves TEA BAGGING. They're going to "lick" Obama's tax plan! It's going to take "dick army / Dick Armey" to tea bag the whole country! The jokes practically write themselves, as MSNBC clearly understood.

feline

I don't really get down with kitten videos on the internet, and I don't really love LOLcats. But for some reason, "Kittens, inspired by kittens" gets to me.

killer

The headline reads: "Pedestrian Is Struck, Then Dragged 17 Miles." Here's the lead: "A pedestrian was hit by an S.U.V. in Queens, then struck by a van and dragged into Brooklyn. He is dead."

That list bit seemed a little unnecessary, no?

photographic punk

Here's an interesting 9-minute video about Glen E. Friedman, an early photographer of punk, skateboarding and hip-hop. If you're into any of those three things, you've no doubt seen his photos. From BoingBoing.

Post-Bush, day 1

Quick thought:

Recently Christopher Hitchens threw a party, where he said an interesting thing:

Hitchens opined on whether the Obama administration should answers calls from the left to prosecute Bush administration officials for illegal interrogation of prisoners [...] Hitchens then claimed that the Bush administration's commitment to harsh interrogation techniques, which he considers torture, derived from a desire among Americans for a more “ruthless” government. “It has to be admitted by every American that in the majority after the 9/11 Commission, people wanted an administration that was much more ruthless than the one they'd had on September the 10th,” he said. “I know something for a sure thing,” Hitchens continued. “The demand for torture and other methods I would describe as illegal, the demand to go outside the Geneva conventions — all this came from below. What everyone wants to say is this came from a small clique around the vice-president. It's not educational. It doesn't enlighten anyone to behave as if that were true. This is our society wanting and demanding harsh measures.”

I have to admit that when I read this it struck me as correct. I think that Hitchens is a smart guy, and for as much as I sometimes dislike him, I think he is very good at calling out people for acting righteous when they aren't. After all, isn't the call for prosecution of Bush and Rumsfeld done in bad faith--at least a little? I think many Americans did want something like torture, and I think that members of Congress were perfectly happy to allow the law to be blurred for that reason. In this sense, the call for prosecutions is really done in bad faith; a prosecution of Bush/Rumsfeld is nothing other than our desire to prosecute ourselves for fucking it up--a way for us to feel good by projecting evil onto a finite group of people who is not us. Great.

And even as I say that, I have to think that Hitchens is still wrong. Mandates do come from below, yes, but if we know anything about the psychology of authority--if we've learned anything from the Holocaust, the Stanford Prison experiment or the Migram experiment--it is that the people below will do what they are told to do and to think what they are told to think. So where does blame lay--with the American public or with the leadership?

I suppose this begs the question of what we think leadership is. If we think the job of the leader is to enact those things that the populace wants, then we are guilty. But if we think leadership means the ability to lead, then prosecute away. So what was Bush, then? A terrible non-leader? Or a criminal? Those might be the two options.

Elf dung

Blogging will continue to be light as long as the global economic apocalypse continues. In fact, consider me on strike. Me and Santa.

Santa Claus Bailout Hearings - watch more funny videos

Letters exchanged between Giorgio Agamben and Hannah Arendt. Who knew?


Got it here.